William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
NICE OF THEM – AT 9:39 A.M. ET: From NewsBusters:
COMMENT: They're kind of like the old Leninists. Things and people just disappear. There's much buzz tonight, although I can't confirm it, that Obama himself chose Petraeus for the Afghanistan assignment, even though Petraeus wasn't on the list of generals recommended by Secretary of Defense Gates. That raises all kinds of questions as to what Obama's motive is. Did he simply decide to pick the best man? Does he want to wrap an Afghanistan failure around Petraeus's neck? Is he trying to sideline Petraeus as a possible 2012 presidential nominee? We may never find out, but, as we noted earlier today, Petraeus is politically savvy, and it's unlikely he'd allow himself to fall into a political trap. The coming Petraeus-Obama relationship will be one of the most intriguing, I would imagine, that we've seen in recent years. Petraeus is said to be a "Rockefeller Republican." Hmm. I'm just throwing this out: Will we see an Obama-Petraeus ticket in 2012, and Petraeus, as a Democrat, in 2016? I don't think so, but it's juicy. June 24, 2010 |
|